[anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih at richih.org
Fri Nov 12 14:15:56 CET 2010
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 13:47, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-10.html Makes sense to me. As an aside, could the RIPE provide an additional diff view of those proposals? Hunting for changes and making sure you didn't miss a potentially crucial word is not that much fun and I suspect most of us end up pasting the text into vimdiff or similar, anyway. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]