[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kostas Zorbadelos
kzorba at otenet.gr
Wed Nov 10 14:41:21 CET 2010
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 14:58:52 Tobias Knecht wrote: > Am 10.11.2010 13:49, schrieb Marco Hogewoning: > >>> I am missing your point here. These might be a lot of garbage > >>> data. What is wrong about have ONE consistent way to publish > >>> abuse contacts? Don't you find this "A Good Thing"? > >> > >> And how anybody could stop publishing this kind of info in remark > >> fields? > > > > Yups, +1...we can discard the abuse-mailbox field but not the > > remarks. That's why I suggested to get the statistics done again. > > Most likely the majority of the objects are still covered with a > > remarks line and at least that is better than nothing. > > Don't get me wrong. I do not want to delete data before there is a IRT. > Since the IRT will be mandatory, RIPE is able to push things faster. > Contact people, ask them to update, ... > > This will take some time. And there is no reason to say, that we will > delete the existing abuse-mailbox attributes not before an IRT is setup. > There is no reason not to change "end of 2012" into "end of 2013" > > The point is, that this discussion is going on for more than 7 years now > and there is still no sufficient solution. > I agree with Tobias point on this. From what I read in the proposal I didn't understand that anything will be deleted, or any current information get lost. It is just a direction, that in the long run will result in publishing abuse contacts in a sigle well defined way. >1) Poor data quality regarding points of contact >2) The fact that there are multiple places people store this info Having said this, of course the proposal addresses the point no2. For the data quality a first step is the 2010-09 proposal from what I understand. Kostas > Thanks, > > Tobias > > abusix.org
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]