[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tobias Knecht
tk at abusix.com
Wed Nov 10 12:18:25 CET 2010
Am 10.11.2010 12:01, schrieb Sander Steffann: >> Creating a 'single point' makes it implicit that others should >> disappear and you might throw away a load of data and you don't >> know what you will get back for it. > > I wasn't thinking about throwing away any data. A single point > containing at least the same amount of information that we have now > would be very nice though. The difficult part is how to migrate all > that information to that single point... Full Ack. A mandatory place will help with the migration process. Asking members to create IRT Objects over a period of 2 years should migrate a huge amount. Contacting the members without a valid IRT link every 6 or 12 month will help as well. Thanks, Tobias abusix.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101110/90ffce9e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]