[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tobias Knecht
tk at abusix.com
Wed Nov 10 11:22:40 CET 2010
Am 10.11.2010 10:24, schrieb Richard Hartmann: > 2010/11/10 Tobias Knecht <tk at abusix.com>: > >> The next step that will happen, or is already happening is that ISPs are >> using the reputation data you are talking about to block, for example >> email, which is a pretty good idea in my opinion. "As long as you do not >> offer a address where I can complain about your traffic I do not want >> your traffic." > > I don't see this happening; ever. Large impact triggered by a way too > low metric. Some ISPs in Europe are already using this as a greylisting reason. > That being said, I still think a single canonical place to store abuse > handling information is A Very Good Thing. And that is one of my main intentions with this proposal. Thanks, Tobias -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101110/c2f456fe/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]