[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Wed Nov 10 02:11:04 CET 2010
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 16:45, Denis Walker <denis at ripe.net> wrote: > We have already weakened its main purpose by making the above attributes > optional. For Incident Response Teams these should be mandatory > attributes. Now they are required attributes, but as we cannot > distinguish between the two different roles this object now serves we > cannot enforce this requirement. If we loosen the requirements any > further for the IRT object it will no longer serve its original purpose. According to the technical howto [1] the irt object already has a concept of trust levels, albeit as a remark. Formalizing a level attribute would allow unverified mostly-optional irt objects to exist in parallel to unverified mostly-required and trusted introduction all-required ones. Richard [1] http://www.ripe.net/db/support/security/irt/irt-h2.html
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]