[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Scholten
mark at streamservice.nl
Mon May 3 16:57:02 CEST 2010
> -----Original Message----- > From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- > admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Marco Hogewoning > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:22 PM > To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy > Proposal > > (Wearing my private citizen head) > > > 4.3 Delete abuse-mailbox fields in all objects that do not define an > IRT, and delete > > the trouble field everywhere in 2011. > > This is a really bad idea, there is no guarantee those objects will > allready be updated to link to an IRT object, nor is there a guarantee > those objects will ever be updated to start linking to IRT. So you end > up throwing away perfectly good data and end up with even more > difficulties to find contact details. Is it acceptable for you if this is done when there is an IRT (and require it to have an IRT before 2013)? Mark
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]