[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Emanuele Balla
balla at spin.it
Fri Jul 23 16:57:21 CEST 2010
On 7/23/10 4:32 PM, Tobias Knecht wrote: > Hello together, > > why are we moving the problem of non existing abuse contact away from > open access to bulk access. > > I would suggest the following. [...] > Creating an IRT Object with an abuse-mailbox attribute. > - Introduce the IRT Object into ASN Objects. > - Make the abuse-mailbox attribute mandatory for the IRT Objects. > - Make IRT Objects mandatory for directly by RIPE delegated Ranges. > > IMHO this will solve all the problems. "All the problems" is maybe too optimistic, but at least we have something to start with. +1 I also like Richard's idea of xxxxxxxxx at abuse.ripe.net contact addresses: this will solve (part of) the problem of email-address exposure AND allow abuse address reachability monitoring. -- # Emanuele Balla # # # System & Network Engineer # Cell: +39 348 7747907 # # Spin s.r.l. - AS6734 # Phone: +39 040 9869090 # # Trieste # Email: balla at staff.spin.it #
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]