[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam costs are huge!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Wed Jul 14 14:28:34 CEST 2010
* Tobias Knecht: > 4.1 Institute a mandatory reference to an IRT object in inetnum, > inet6num and aut-num objects. So it seems to me that one particular problem is that the abuse-mailbox data is not available in the bulk database dumps, and neither are the IRT objects. Wouldn't it be easier if RIPE created person/role object dumps, containing only the nic-hdl and the abuse-mailbox field? IRT object dumps would make a lot of sense, too. Historically, IRT objects had significant organizational overhead and have been subject to politics, so I'm not sure if they are the proper answer. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam costs are huge!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]