[anti-abuse-wg] Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes – RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes – RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes – RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Thu Dec 16 16:20:18 CET 2010
Shane, "Shane Kerr" wrote the following on 15/12/2010 23:15: > Brian, > > A small clarification: > > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 15:47 +0000, Brian Nisbet wrote: >> Shane Kerr, ISC, said he thought this situation might be a reflection of >> a larger disconnect between the Anti-Abuse Working Group and the ISPs. >> He said people in the Anti-Abuse Working Group often had goals that were >> very disconnected from the Internet community at large. He said the >> people in the working group would use this as another example of people >> in the Internet community not listening to their wishes. > > I think that my point was that there is a disconnect between people > working on anti-abuse and the ISPs, not about the Anti-Abuse Working > Group or its participants. I might not have said that of course... I'll reflect that clarification, thanks. Brian.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes – RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes – RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]