[anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Olivier Beckers/ZB00036/EniCoordinationCenter-BE/ENI/IT is out of the office.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Cox
richard.cox at btuser.net
Tue Aug 10 21:38:00 CEST 2010
Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: > Maybe we should make a rehersal, vote or proposal to answer a simply > question: "should RIPE create regulations to remove resources because > of abuse ?" The RIPE Policy Development Process is at your disposal. The AAWG is just as entitled to propose and agree a policy as any of the other RIPE WGs. You seem to have a lot of sympathetic ears here, so over to you. In the interests of Full Disclosure, I should mention that I will be submitting some of my own proposals very shortly (I referred to them briefly in Prague); they include providing registration- / changed-dates for IP and ASN allocations in all WHOIS responses (ie without requiring the -b switch) and also providing information in the standard WHOIS data on which LIR (if any) was involved in allocating a specific resource -- Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Olivier Beckers/ZB00036/EniCoordinationCenter-BE/ENI/IT is out of the office.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]