[anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Esa Laitinen
esa.laitinen at iki.fi
Mon Apr 12 11:18:52 CEST 2010
2010/4/11 Frank Gadegast <phade at www.powerweb.de> > I think that everything IS spam, what somebody, who receives it, is > bothered > with, because he did no want it, he feel offended, did not ask for it > or whatever personal reason. > > Really? So the newsletter you've subscribed yesterday, received the first issue today and was happy about it, turns into spam tomorrow when they publish a story that annoys you? Now we're entering very interesting terrain... > You have a mail address and receive stuff you did not ask for, > that has nothing to do with business or interest. > No, but it is something to do with consent, don't you think? The consent should be the most important thing when considering if something is spam. > And if I feel abused, I think its spam. > I might think that white is black, but it doesn't make it so. Consent, that is the key. And thats excatly what is the background idea of a spam report > delivery system. > Let the recipient decide, what he think hes abuse about. > > So, are you talking about abuse, or are you talking about spam? -- Esa Laitinen Tel. +41 76 200 2870 skype/yahoo: reunaesa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20100412/e1aa85f4/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] spam definition
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]