<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/></head><body style="font-family:Geneva,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">Dear Community,<br />
<br />
<div>
Our case: we don't have PA-allocated space. but we have many clients who need IPs. We found ISP who won't make transfer, while this is not very simple procedure, but ready to make sub-allocation. </div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Current policy allows to do suballocations, but maximum size is /20 every twelve months for one ISP. This is too small count.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
I suggest: remove restrictions for size of network and period (possibility to suballocate without any restractions instead of twelve months ).</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Pros:</div>
<div>
1. No any work for RIPE (transfers requered additional work from RIPE side)</div>
<div>
2. Simple and fast. Just register sub-allocation in RIPE Database.</div>
<div>
3. Allow effective and fast use IPv4 space.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
I think in nearest time question of using IP-addresees from other ISP will be very popular and the more simple to use IPv4 addresses from other LIRs is better for community.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
This idea was presented on Address Policy Working Group, Thursday 27 Sep, RIPE 65, Amsterdam.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
--</div>
<div>
Alexey Ivanov</div>
<div>
Owner & General Director LeaderTelecom Ltd.</div>
<div>
Owner & Managing Director LeaderTelecom B.V.</div>
</body></html>