It�s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP address for next three months but my company after giving all requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 subnet!!! <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Martin Millnert <<a href="mailto:millnert@gmail.com" target="_blank">millnert@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Hi Hamed, Yes, it's a lottery! Sorry that you didn't win. I didn't either, tried to get a PI out. :) �But didn't get it. Best, Martin <div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"> On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 18:47 +0430, Hamed Shafaghi wrote: > It�s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP > address for next three months but my company after giving all > requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 > subnet!!! > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Martin Millnert <<a href="mailto:millnert@gmail.com">millnert@gmail.com</a>> > wrote: > � � � � On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 15:56 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > � � � � > The delegated-ripencc-extended-latest shows which blocks > � � � � were free at the start of the day, then it's just a matter of > � � � � some whois queries to figure out the rest. > � � � � > > � � � � > Right now it seems 128.0.107.0-128.0.111.255 are still free, > � � � � plus those five /24s out of 192/8 I listed earlier. And maybe > � � � � those /25+es (didn't check as I'm on the road at the moment). > � � � � So it's pretty much all gone now. > � � � � > > � � � � > Tore > > > � � � � Right, as per the announcements [1][2] as well, we're > � � � � officially in > � � � � final /8 land now, and IPRAs ran the "available pool" down to > � � � � the > � � � � ground. > > � � � � So, somewhere between 35-60M EUR locked up for the RIPE NCC > � � � � now, from > � � � � one-shot-LIRs, with current policy. Does the RIPE NCC need all > � � � � this > � � � � money or will that complicate things, especially w.r.t IPv4 as > � � � � an asset > � � � � issues? �Or does it matter what we do? > > � � � � IPv4 just became an asset in this land regardless. :-) > > � � � � Best, > � � � � Martin > > � � � � [1] > � � � � <a href="http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2012-September/000615.html" target="_blank">http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2012-September/000615.html</a> > � � � � [2] > � � � � <a href="https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/ripe-ncc-begins-to-allocate-ipv4-address-space-from-the-last-8" target="_blank">https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/ripe-ncc-begins-to-allocate-ipv4-address-space-from-the-last-8</a> > > > > > > -- > I Hamed Shafaghi I > I Managing Director I > </div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> I Skydsl� Telecom I <a href="mailto:hamed@skydsl.ir">hamed@skydsl.ir</a> I <a href="http://www.skydsl.ir" target="_blank">www.skydsl.ir</a> I </div></div></blockquote></div> -- I Hamed Shafaghi I I Managing Director I <img src="http://www.skydsl.ir/image/arm.png"> I Skydsl� Telecom I <a href="mailto:hamed@skydsl.ir" target="_blank">hamed@skydsl.ir</a> I <a href="http://www.skydsl.ir" target="_blank">www.skydsl.ir</a> I