This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Are anonymised assignment objects valid?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Are anonymised assignment objects valid?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Who do I speak for?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis walker
ripedenis at gmail.com
Tue Oct 3 18:05:14 CEST 2023
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 17:00, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > > > - realise that the current internet is not the internet that this DB was designed for > > > > Might as well stop issuing policy at all, then. > > The thought did cross my mind ;) or redesign the DB to fit the internet we have today!!! An option that still, nobody will even discuss. How much more proof do we need that this 25 year old design needs attention? (Well you could read Ed's latest impact analysis on a small DB feature change to assignments.) cheers denis co-chair DB-WG > > Cheers! > Sander > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Are anonymised assignment objects valid?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Who do I speak for?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]