[address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arash Naderpour
arash_mpc at parsun.com
Thu Jun 22 13:21:01 CEST 2023
Hi Mike, Are these setups still multihome? Regardsm Arash Naderpour On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:12 PM Mike Bromwich <mike.bromwich at stacuity.com> wrote: > Hi, > > One other aspect to consider - there are situations where public ASNs (and > addresses) are required - but not directly connected to the Internet. > Therefore, they do not appear in the Internet routing tables but are > legitimately used elsewhere. > > For example, in our field (mobile cellular networks) mobile operators are > connected using the IPX network as managed by the GSMA. This is distinct > from the Internet but public ASNs and addresses are required. > > The relevant guidelines from the GSMA: > https://www.gsma.com/newsroom/wp-content/uploads/IR.40-v8.0.pdf > > 'The GSMA worked closely with the all the RIR communities (RIPE NCC, ARIN > and APNIC) > to develop and produce the early versions of this document. This was > essential to ensure > that the proposed guidelines to the Service Providers associated with > requesting and > implementing Public addresses are aligned with the existing policies and > procedures of the > RIR community.' > > 'New Public address space assignment must be requested by Service > Providers and IPX > Providers from the appropriate LIR/NIR/DR using existing procedures > supported by its > respective serving RIR. > > This document can be used as part of the request submitted by the Service > Provider as a > source of reference to help explain the requirement for Public address > space.' > > Perhaps there are other such networks which work in the same way? Perhaps > there should be a mechanism to record or report that resources are in use > elsewhere and so should not be recovered? > > Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of > Marco Schmidt > Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 2:31 PM > To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: [address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible > ASN Resource Management > > Dear colleagues, > > At RIPE 86, we shared some observations regarding Autonomous System Number > (ASN) requests and usage [1]. > > We see an increasing number of ASN requests coming from both inside and > outside of our service region. This seems to be driven primarily by the low > cost and ease of receiving an ASN from the RIPE NCC. The downside is that > we also see a significant decrease in responsible resource management by > these resource holders. A large number of ASNs are never used or become > abandoned after a short period. > > Some data: in the last two years, we have provided 4,186 ASNs (between > March 2021 and February 2023). Of this amount, we can see that 1,478 ASNs > (more than 35%) do not appear to be in use, as they are not visible in the > routing system. > > Looking at total numbers, we have issued almost 38,000 ASNs, of which more > than 8,000 (~20%) are not visible. > > This growing trend not only creates avoidable work for Registration > Services and added costs for the membership, we believe it also undermines > the goal of responsible management of Internet number resources within our > service region. > > As the membership voted against an annual service fee for ASNs at the > recent RIPE NCC General Meeting, I would like to ask the working group for > guidance on how resource holders can be motivated to manage their ASNs > responsibly and how the RIPE NCC can provide support for this. > > We also plan to intensify our ongoing project to clean up unused > Autonomous System (AS) Numbers [2]. Almost 2,000 unused ASNs have been > recovered as part of this work so far. Do you support our approach here? > And are there other ways we could improve the situation? Perhaps you could > add clarification on requesting and returning ASNs in the relevant RIPE > policy, or maybe we could give a stronger mandate and responsibility to the > sponsoring LIRs. > > > > If you have an ASN registered to you that you don’t need anymore, you can > always contact us through the LIR Portal or via your sponsoring LIR and we > will arrange for the return of this resource. > > Kind regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Manager Registration Services > RIPE NCC > > > > [1] > > https://ripe86.ripe.net/wp-content/uploads/presentations/82-RIPE86-Feeback-from-RS-reviewed.pdf > > [2] https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/as-numbers/as-number-clean-up > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20230622/d1324e61/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]