[address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)

-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of Shane Kerr
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2023 5:35 PM
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)

<snip/>

> If I recall correctly, the original motivation of the IXP policy was to allow IXP to get space, even if they did not otherwise 
> qualify to become an LIR. This was so that they could maintain independence from LIR peering at the IXP.

> However, there are basically no restrictions on becoming an LIR, and basically no space available. So there is no reason 
> for a special IXP policy.

> My own preference is that we stop IXP IPv4 assignments completely. IXP can purchase IPv4 space on the open market 
> the same as everyone else.

> Shane

I don't typically comment on address policy because it might look self-serving, but someone asked me to comment. 

Thinking about the costs to set up an IXP, I went back to this RIPE presentation a few years ago: "The $1,000 Internet Exchange" 
https://ripe71.ripe.net/presentations/30-1000-dollar-exchange-ripe71.pdf

Market price for a /24 might be high enough to prevent an IXP from forming. Even a significant subnet might be expensive, and that's if someone was willing and able to sell a /26.

Lee