[address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Review Phase (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Review Phase (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI /46 Assignment Request Experience Summary
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed Apr 26 10:19:35 CEST 2023
Hi, I also support this proposal, after reading the NCC's impact analysis. I was a bit surprised to see there is a /13 reserved for temporary assignments, and only a /15 for IXPs (just read also 2023-01...). I would also like to add a +1 to what Cynthia wrote, even if this will require a version 2.0 of this proposal. Regards, Carlos On Tue, 11 Apr 2023, Cynthia Revström via address-policy-wg wrote: > I support the policy proposal. > However, I would prefer to see the second paragraph of the proposed article 3.3 reworded. Currently it's just one really long sentence > and it was a bit difficult for me to read. I'm pretty sure that I got the point but I think it should be improved and disambiguated a > bit. > > -Cynthia > > On Mon, 3 Apr 2023, 11:04 Angela Dall'Ara, <adallara at ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > > > Policy proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments", is now in the Review Phase. > > > > This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size for IPv4 temporary assignments to a /24, while still > allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to > justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes. > > > > The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this proposal to support the community?s discussion. > > > > You can find the proposal and impact analysis at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02 > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02#impact-analysis > > And the draft documents at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02/draft > > > > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week Review Phase is to continue discussion of > the proposal taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document. > > > > At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. > > It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase. > > > > We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and to send any comments to > address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 2 May 2023. > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Angela Dall'Ara > > Policy Officer > > RIPE NCC > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Review Phase (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI /46 Assignment Request Experience Summary
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]