[address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Review Phase (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)

Hi,

I also support this proposal, after reading the NCC's impact analysis.

I was a bit surprised to see there is a /13 reserved for temporary 
assignments, and only a /15 for IXPs (just read also 2023-01...).

I would also like to add a +1 to what Cynthia wrote, even if this will 
require a version 2.0 of this proposal.


Regards,
Carlos



On Tue, 11 Apr 2023, Cynthia Revström via address-policy-wg wrote:

> I support the policy proposal.
> However, I would prefer to see the second paragraph of the proposed article 3.3 reworded. Currently it's just one really long sentence
> and it was a bit difficult for me to read. I'm pretty sure that I got the point but I think it should be improved and disambiguated a
> bit.
> 
> -Cynthia
> 
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2023, 11:04 Angela Dall'Ara, <adallara at ripe.net> wrote:
>
>       Dear colleagues,
>
>        
>
>       Policy proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments", is now in the Review Phase.
>
>        
>
>       This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size for IPv4 temporary assignments to a /24, while still
>       allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to
>       justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes.
>
>        
>
>       The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this proposal to support the community?s discussion.
>
>        
>
>       You can find the proposal and impact analysis at:
>
>       https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02
>
>       https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02#impact-analysis
>
>       And the draft documents at:
>
>       https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02/draft
>
>        
>
>       As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week Review Phase is to continue discussion of
>       the proposal taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document.
>
>        
>
>       At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus.
>
>       It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.
>
>        
>
>       We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and to send any comments to
>       address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 2 May 2023.
>
>        
>
>        
>
>       Kind regards,
>
>        
>
>       Angela Dall'Ara
>
>       Policy Officer
>
>       RIPE NCC
> 
> --
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit:
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> 
> 
>