[address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 04:23:20PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
> To add to this discussion: I took this to the Connect WG, and the
> initial feedback I got from there is that they have no problem with
> reevaluating this every 8 or so years (what seems to be the current
> rate of use of the IXP pool), and that they would be perfectly happy
> with not doing anything right now and reevaluating this in 2027 or
> so.

By then, all the IXP landscape will be DECIX global layer2 anyway,
so all we need is a /15 for DECIX, and all the ASes in the world can
connect to it.

Now, getting that /15 might be a bit complicated...  maybe we really
need to go for "ipv4 over ipv6 transport", then, like the cloudfolks
already do...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20221027/2e7f996c/attachment.sig>