[address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
George Michaelson
ggm at algebras.org
Tue Oct 11 20:56:22 CEST 2022
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022, 20:50 Marco Schmidt, <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > > One possible solution would be to review the current policy and propose > a policy change, for example the introduction of a minimum IPv4 > assignment size. > > Does the working group agree that this is an issue that should be > discussed and that might require a policy change? > I value research being done immensely as a downstream consumer of its findings. This stuff helps us decide how to manage addresses in the wide. Noting that I work in an RIR (APNIC) I would welcome a conversation seeking to improve access to routable prefixes by researchers, so we can see good research on BGP, security, routing and network behaviour. I was aware of difficulties for at least one research group in almost all RIR over last year. I think this topic merits discussing. Cheers George -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20221012/86e98756/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]