[address-policy-wg] 2022-02 New Policy Proposal (Remove mandatory IPv4 PA assignment registration in the RIPE Database)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2022-02 New Policy Proposal (Remove mandatory IPv4 PA assignment registration in the RIPE Database)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Tue Nov 1 11:46:52 CET 2022
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 11:25 AM Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote: > > I think, therefore, that it would be good to bring the policy text > itself in alignment with the de facto/best practice interpretation most > of us follow. 2022-02 in its current form is one way to do that, while > backporting IPv6's AGGREGATED-BY-LIR would be another. > > I don't have anything to add really, just my agreement. Thanks, Tore! -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20221101/daad6751/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2022-02 New Policy Proposal (Remove mandatory IPv4 PA assignment registration in the RIPE Database)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]