[address-policy-wg] Policy building - call for volunteers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy building - call for volunteers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy building - call for volunteers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Stanislav
ms at uakom.sk
Tue Mar 29 11:50:50 CEST 2022
Hi James, On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:59:44AM +0200, James Kennedy wrote: > > 2.1. The task force recommends that as resource holders have full > responsibility over the registration of their IPv4 PA assignment(s), > they are free to make assignments or not. If the community accepts > this recommendation, the relevant RIPE Policies should be updated > accordingly, and documenting IPv4 PA assignment(s) will stop being a > policy requirement. Is this line of thought that a responsibility over the registration of an aggregate IP resource implies optional documenting of a resouce subset explained somewhere? Was utilization of an aggregate resource the only reason to document details? Thank you for comments or pointers. Martin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy building - call for volunteers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy building - call for volunteers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]