[address-policy-wg] Review of IPv6 policy goals

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:31:53PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Or, are you saying that just reviewing the current policy situation
> requires several years of *agile* reviewing period, after which
> several tens of years will be wasted to modify current policy
> only after, in the real world, IPv6 will be fully abandoned?

The intent was to have a small group come up with something like a
current policy assessment

 - what were the original goals?
 - have we succeeded in reaching them?
   - if not, is there something that should be done differently?
 - is the situation today, 25 years later, significantly different?
   - if yes, which goals could be adjusted?

 - and then, discuss consequences of these findings, in the larger
   group (or maybe come to the conclusion that some of the findings
   are just incorrect due to small-group bias)

It turns out that we're all not very agile and have spent too much time
with families and friends instead of working on that document, so there is
nothing to present yet.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20220316/adc6a98c/attachment.sig>