[address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Feb 3 14:43:56 CET 2022
> I *do* like the suggestion Daniel Karrenberg made how to tackle this - > give the NCC more liberty how to handle "experiments" by consulting, > if needed, with an expert panel. I do see the issue in defining > "expert", but maybe this could be made sufficiently lightweight - "ask > for a volunteer group of individuals that have had hands-on experience > with BGP routing for <n> years" (because, I think, that's really the > crucial part here, to differenciate from other setups that can do the > 50% just fine, or use RFC1918 space instead). you are a (new) LIR applying for IP space. you submit an addressing plan. the ncc convenes a volunteer panel of your competitors to evaluate that plan. oops! tragically, research is competitive, and the ideas are the protein. [ fyi, i admit to being just a shill here. it was reg services who asked for help on the issue. ] randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]