[address-policy-wg] do we need a policy for avoiding "multiple unjustified LIRs"?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] do we need a policy for avoiding "multiple unjustified LIRs"?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] do we need a policy for avoiding "multiple unjustified LIRs"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Staff
policy at ntx.ru
Tue Nov 23 11:53:20 CET 2021
Hello everybody, Of cause no. That will not help. always possible to avoid. Doing more complex polices is not good way. NCC had already lot of issues with that. Does any body remember how they asked to use email with the name to use in their database and people should change emails lot of times to sutisfy NCC.... We did a lot of noise and NCC canceled it. Brr... If people request space - then they need it and they select this way to get it with NCC. This is normal process. No rush here. NCC should work as usual. Yury
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] do we need a policy for avoiding "multiple unjustified LIRs"?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] do we need a policy for avoiding "multiple unjustified LIRs"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]