[address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Dec 8 08:41:45 CET 2021
Hi, On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 06:03:53PM +1100, Arash Naderpour wrote: > >My suggestion would be along the lines what was proposed on the APWG > >meeting already - earmark these /24s as non-transferrable, ever. > > I don't think it is a good idea to split the IPv4 addresses into different > types, transferable and non-transferrable. it puts those newcomers in a > disadvantageous position compared to the older members, it is not fair and > doesn't fix anything in long term. Actually, the point is to have something to offer to the newcomers. If we do not stop the hoarding *now*, there won't be any IPv4 left - would that be "more fair" to the newcomers? I wouldn't mind a policy that says "The RIPE NCC does no longer deal in IPv4 resources at all. Everything coming back into the RIPE NCC free pool is returned to IANA." - that would be maximally *fair* (the same amount of nothing for everybody), but I assume you wouldn't like that either. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20211208/4c81059f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]