[address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Thornton
paul at prtsystems.ltd.uk
Wed Oct 28 15:24:32 CET 2020
On 28/10/2020 13:03, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Hi Jordi, > > JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote on 28/10/2020 12:13: >> Could you explain why not? > > because the purpose of a registry is to ensure accurate registration > information rather than to micromanage resources. As far as I can > see, the RIPE NCC is doing its job here and there's no need to > instruct it to go off and do something else. > > There's no shortage of ipv6 address space and no reason to think that > we will ever end up with a future shortage. So there is no reason for > people to treat ipv6 address blocks as having future scarcity value, > which means that there is no motivation to "stockpile". I.e. the > entire basis of your argument is void. +1. I also strongly believe that there is no real problem to solve here. Paul.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]