[address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Oct 28 14:43:29 CET 2020
> On 28 Oct 2020, at 12:51, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > Exactly, that’s the point, there is no incentive – the only incentive is stockpiling, just in case IPv6 becomes scarse and may create a problem like the lack of IPv4, even if this takes 30 years, or 100 years, and you want to secure the funding of the kids of your kids by having a resource that then, will be subjected to market price and transfers. This is beyond ridiculous. Why isn’t *anyone* worrying about the Y10K problem? I demand action! :-) PS The “won't someone think of the children?” emotional rhetoric is a very strong indication someone doesn’t have an evidence-based argument.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]