[address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Oct 28 14:16:43 CET 2020
> On 28 Oct 2020, at 12:05, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > However, in RIPE NCC, if you created several LIRs for getting more IPv4 allocations, *even if you don't use/need it* you can get (and thus stockpile) IPv6 *at no extra cost*. > > I clearly think this is not a good thing. Why? What actual problems is this alleged stockpiling causing? Is there any v6 stockpiling taking place? Why would anyone need/want to stockpile v6 when the *lowest* allocation they’d get gives them orders of magnitude more address space than they could ever hope to use. I think the onus is on you to provide a clear problem statement before making policy proposals. It’s not at all clear there’s an actual problem to solve.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]