[address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arash Naderpour
arash_mpc at parsun.com
Fri Oct 25 08:08:06 CEST 2019
Hi, Do we know how many /29 we have available in the IXP reserved pool? if there are only few ones, it doesn't make scene to me set the default to /29 as it would be a good practice for just few allocations. Can someone from RIPE NCC provide us with an statistic on number of different prefixes in the IXP pool? Regards, Arash >I believe the logical thing to do is to put the default at the /29 as well. Having the default equal to the minimum is the most conservative and thus the best suited for making the IXP pool last "forever". -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20191025/89f16d96/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]