[address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Blessing
james.blessing at despres.co.uk
Tue Oct 15 15:24:30 CEST 2019
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, 13:43 Marco Schmidt, <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > > This proposal aims to change the default IXP assignment size from a /24 > to a needs-based model, with a /27 as a minimum. > L Whilst I support the goal of the proposal the current wording doesn't parse particularly well. By changing 'once' to 'if' and then referencing returned addresses it (possibly) creates a confusion. I would go with... New IXPs will be assigned a /27 as a minimum. If an IXP requires a larger assignment, they must demonstrate need for at least 50% of the new assignment within two years. A maximum assignment of a /22 is available for a suitablly qualified IXP. Any existing addresses (such as PI) used for an IXP peering LAN shall be returned. Feel free to butcher the text further, but I hope I've explained the reason for the change in the change itself Thx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20191015/e9d5e848/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]