[address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Wed Oct 9 10:13:47 CEST 2019
Hi, it doesn't show up in the versions because the transfer deleted the old item and created a new one. - Cynthia On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, 09:14 Ronald F. Guilmette, <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: > In message < > TY2PR0101MB33421E6796B2013776568E52C5950 at TY2PR0101MB3342.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>, > > David Guo <david at xtom.com> wrote: > > >Why don't you do some search? > > I did. I do. I am. I have! > > Please excuse me for having foolishly tried to obtain actual authoritative > information from the actual RIPE WHOIS server, rather than from a Wayback > Machine (archive.org) copy of something that appeared on the bgpview.io > web site. > > Regardless of what that other non-authoritative source of information > may say, may I ask you to please tell me what *you* see when *you* perform > the following two commands? > > whois -h whois.ripe.net -- "--list-versions 62.222.0.0/15" > whois -h whois.ripe.net -- "--show-version 1 62.222.0.0/15" > > Maybe I need new glasses, but I'm not seeing the year 2002 mentioned in > the outputs of these two commands. > > Maybe I'm just doing it wrong. Do I need to try using negative numbers > as arguments to the --show-version option? > > Does that option accept imaginary numbers as arguments? > > > Regards, > rfg > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20191009/efc70546/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 62.222.0.0/15
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]