[address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)

Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote on 13/11/2019 13:41:
> A little late, but here's my point of view:
> - /27 is borderline for a default. Hopefully the 50% use within 2
> years should alleviate this (even if I find it not enough).
> - Anything smaller than a /27 is close to useless. - Renumbering is
> painful and should be avoided as much as possible.
> - IXP growth may be very variable in time. You may struggle for1-2
> years, then add several dozens members the next year. You may easy
> get in a situation when renumbering falls in a period of rapid
> growth, which only makes things worse.
The purpose of a policy should be to fix a specific problem.

As you're speaking in favour of the proposal, can you describe what 
problem you want to see fixed here?

Nick