[address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Leibrand
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Fri Nov 1 16:19:12 CET 2019
His email contained a suggestion to move an entire thread, that is threatening to become all noise and no signal, to a more appropriate discussion venue, namely the diversity working group. His one-word reply (not counting quoting, which modern mail clients do a good job of hiring) may have been the highest signal to noise ratio of this entire OT (albeit legitimate meta-discussion) thread. Scott > On Nov 1, 2019, at 5:57 AM, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > > >> On 1 Nov 2019, at 12:53, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: >> >> Diversity? > > Your email contained 1 word of signal and ~1000 words of noise. > > Please try to be more considerate when you post. > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]