[address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Fondras
ripe at liopen.fr
Wed May 29 15:58:16 CEST 2019
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:42:59PM +0300, Alexandr Popov wrote: > IXPs can use Private-Use Networks such as 10.0.0.0/8. > There is no technical need to spend a valuable resource for such purposes. > It has to be unique. On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > /23 is 512 hosts, which is large by IXP standards. The PCH IXP directory > suggests there are about 20 IXPs worldwide which are larger than 256 > connected parties. > And only 3 with more than 512 connected ASN. But can we imagine some ASN have more than 1 IP on the peering LAN ? I agree there is really a small chance an IXP will ask for more the /23. Still I can't see the point of this limitation. Denis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]