[address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Wed May 29 15:41:00 CEST 2019
Denis Fondras wrote on 29/05/2019 14:11: > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:17:43PM +0200, Marco Schmidt wrote: >> This proposal aims to increase the reserved IPv4 pool for IXPs to a >> /15 and finetune assignment criteria. >> >> You can find the full proposal at: >> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-05 >> > > Just because of "It no longer provides for IXPs that need more than a > /23 of IPv4 space" I am against this proposal. Could the NCC provide any stats on how many /22s have been assigned under the IXP assignment policy? /23 is 512 hosts, which is large by IXP standards. The PCH IXP directory suggests there are about 20 IXPs worldwide which are larger than 256 connected parties. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]