[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed May 29 14:47:00 CEST 2019
Hi Kai, > I don't see this either, hence, while I agree that there should be some wording about the way the (already implicit) waiting list will be implemented/handled, I reject the proposal as-is due to the reduction of the assignment size. > > Reducing the assignment for new LIRs from /22 to /24 neither helps the community, nor the late-coming LIR in question. This presentation from RIPE NCC at RIPE77 shows that changing the allocation size does help significantly: https://ripe77.ripe.net/presentations/71-Andrea_Cima_RIPE_77_APWG.pdf slide 14. > IPv4 is gone, we pray every other minute, so we should act accordingly. Unfortunately the world is not as simple as that :'( Cheers, Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190529/ac532916/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]