[address-policy-wg] PA ??? life after death
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA – life after death
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA ??? life after death
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kai 'wusel' Siering
wusel+ml at uu.org
Wed Mar 13 14:02:56 CET 2019
Hi, on 12.03.2019 19:16, Maxim A Piskunov wrote: > Hello, Gert, Community. > > IPv4 - it's not outdated, exact about IPv4 we are talking. Not about IPv6. IPv4 address space has been used up already, just accept the facts. > And while we still need IPv4 I wake up members to solve issues: > 1. End-user should have independence of LIR You're 20 years late. There are no resources in IPv4 to support this anymore, therefore it's buy IPv4 space (on a market that shouldn't be there in the first place) or become an LIR (better hurry, IPv4 number resources are scarce already) or prepare to renumber in case of LIR closure. > 2. Independence of LIR may be obtained by conversion PA to PI and passing addresses to end-user. (/24 or greatest). Technically, that's true. Feel free to send a proposal according to RIPE's PDP. > 3. Even end-user using address from PA and address block /24 or greatest, we should change policy to allow conversion PA to PI for allocated to end-user's addresses if LIR placed under deregistration procedure. For already stated reasons I do not think that's a way to move forward, but anyone may supply any proposal via the PDP to discuss it within the RIPE Community. > Community, please support my proposals. I do not see any chance for this in this timeline, but am looking forward to discuss it, once a formal proposal exists. Regards, -kai
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA – life after death
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA ??? life after death
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]