[address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Jun 4 22:47:34 CEST 2019
Hi, On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 08:57:55PM +0100, Carlos Friaças wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Gert Doering wrote: > > (...) > > Now, regarding the "monitoring" bit - since we're all mostly well-behaved > > here, > :-))) > > > describing the limitations and requirements upfront and only acting > > in cases where the NCC is informed about misuse works fairly well > > In this specific case would you call the NCC "the police", or would you > classify who informs the NCC as "the police"...? :-) Neither. The NCC is the registry who gives out addresses under very specific conditions, and if these conditions are not met by the receiving side, the address assignment/allocation is automatically voided. This is a pure contractual thing. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190604/ea6a16ba/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]