[address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Tue Jul 23 23:18:56 CEST 2019
Carlos Friaças wrote on 23/07/2019 22:03: > "e.g. geographic association" > > -- really...?????? Yep, really. https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/comp-pol-2018v2.pdf see Section 1.3.4 - Out of region Use. + also: https://afrinic.net/policy/manual > 5.4.6.2 AFRINIC resources are for AFRINIC service region and any use > outside the region should be solely in support of connectivity back > to the AFRINIC region. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]