[address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Tue Jul 23 23:15:33 CEST 2019
Disclaimer: i'm not deeply interested in transfers, that's not what the org i work for usually does... :) (please see inline) On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Jim Reid wrote: >> On 22 Jul 2019, at 14:26, Piotr Strzyzewski via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: >> >> IMHO, this is not the case here. Let's try not to fall in the false dilemma here. > > I'm sorry Piotr, I strongly disagree. The idea that was being proposed imposes retroactive conditions on legacy address holders. Which is very wrong. Policies should never be imposed retroactively. I also don't really like the idea/concept. However, it may be argued that when a transfer happens, the "new owner" doesn't have the same rights than the legacy resource holder, because it didn't receive the space from the original source. But even with that, i still think a new proposal "converting" the status is not something favourable to a legacy resource holder. Plus, i still think the status shouldn't even be allowed to change... (but i know i'm most likely alone on that one...) > If implemented, the suggested policy will discourage legacy holders > from co-operating with the NCC, It has the same effect on coooperation with ARIN/AFRINIC/APNIC/LACNIC ? > Which in turn encourages "creative" > solutions to get around that hypothetical problem and therefore bring > about new ways to undermine the integrity of the NCC database. Well, looking at the other 4 regions' status on this topic, probably the most creative solution is to push the transfer through the RIPE NCC... :-)) Regards, Carlos > I fail to see what the false dichotomy is. Or could be. > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]