[address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Sat Jul 20 15:46:09 CEST 2019
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019, at 08:25, Piotr Strzyzewski via address-policy-wg wrote: > > I fail to see much support for your well-formulated problem statement. > > So count me as one of the supporters. I see at least two extra Count me too. However, please note that we are AGAIN discussing about IPv4, since this issue does not exist with IPv6 addresses. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]