[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Wed Feb 27 11:08:11 CET 2019
Hi Gert, As I attempted to explain this was 3 separate uses that required separate announcements. - Cynthia On 2019-02-27 11:05, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 08:47:04AM +0000, Krasimir Ganchev via address-policy-wg wrote: >> I couldn't agree more with Cynthia, policies are too strict and require justification which doesn't allow expansion over time and is just based on immediate needs. >> >> All that especially in the era of exhausted IPv4 is practically unbelievable. >> >> No offense of course, just the reality. > This claim is just not true. > > There might be some cases where expectations and grandeur plans do not > match reality, and in this cases it's reasonable that the NCC is strict > and will not hand out a /19 to someone who can fulfill all their expected > needs with a /32. > > There are other cases where the NCC is asking lots of questions, and maybe > there are cases where the NCC is too strict. So we need to talk about these > and see if it's "lack of reasonable documentation on the user side" or > "annoying interpretation on the NCC side". > > OTOH, a /48 for an end-user site or a /29 for an ISP is pretty huge > (we have not even extended our /32 to a /29 as we assume that we will > never manage to fill the /32) - and documented reality shows that *if* > you need more, you can get it today. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair, and IPv6 user from day one, where the policies were > *much* stricter than today
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]