[address-policy-wg] irrelevant and meaningless Subject header goes here
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Feb 8 16:39:58 CET 2019
> On 8 Feb 2019, at 15:34, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > "usage based" is "you pay for the amount of work and other costs you create > at the NCC", which is about what we have now. I think we need a new thread or two. What’s now being discussed is far removed from 2019-02.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]