[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Thu Feb 7 18:34:54 CET 2019
Hello, On 2/7/19 1:17 PM, Servereasy via address-policy-wg wrote: > I oppose this proposal, unless at least RIPE NCC will charge members > based on how much IPv4 space they have. I find that this will be the > only way to really boost IPv6 adoption. this is problem maily due to law and related taxes. Such diversification was here and this changed few years back. I think only one reason, which will really boost IPv6 adoption is real exhaustion of IPv4 pool within our (RIPE) region. 2019-02 proposal is just delay this (and allowing more newcomers to start their bussiness), nothing else. - Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]