[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu Feb 7 08:49:56 CET 2019
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, Kai 'wusel' Siering wrote: (...) > I'd rather hand that /21 as two /22 to two new LIRs instead of eight /24 > to eight new LIRs, since a /24 is basically useless anyway. I really don't agree with the former. The spirit of 2019-02 is precisely that a /24 is the minimum usable allocation, mostly due to global routability. An ORG/LIR might get a second /24 if needed (through a new LIR account), but it needs to go back into the queue... (if there is any at some point). (...) > IIRC, billing discussions are out of scope for the APWG. Besides, billing is not per resource currently, is it? Here we are 200% in agreement :-) Cheers, Carlos > Regards, > -kai > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]