[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Fondras
ripe at liopen.fr
Wed Feb 6 12:32:41 CET 2019
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:23:53AM +0100, Martin Huněk wrote: > Here it starts. I would say get such a LIR what you have got (to /22 of > course). Even by means of multiple /24s. But not blocks smaller than /24, as > it would be useless. Maybe let them decide if they would like to wait for > whole /22 where there would be less then 4x /24 (in that one case). > [...] > If you keep there /22 and /24 as an option, than there would be no problem. No please, don't let LIR choose. This will only complicate management of resources. In a FIFO, a LIR asking for /22 would delay a LIR who only needs a /24.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]