[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24) (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24) (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing, IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed Feb 6 11:06:37 CET 2019
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, Kai 'wusel' Siering wrote: (...) > >> I know some company can have multiple entity to buy extra range. Some company is cheap to register like in UK. >> Maybe use company UBO registry obligation in EU can fight that ? > > RIPE Region does cover more than just EU (EU28 or EU27 doesn't matter here). Precisely. As i understand it, any company in the world just needs to declare that has infrastructure within the RIPE NCC service region in order to access RIPE NCC services. I didn't check, but i've heard this doesn't work in the same way on the other four RIRs... I think changes to this can be addressed through the PDP, but someone has to issue the proposal for this to happen. Cheers, Carlos > Regards, > -kai > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24) (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing, IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]