[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24) (fwd)

Hello,
After reading the prupose and some archive on this mailing (you can over 
ripe website) , i have an idea about the reason of prupose.
The /24 proposal is for emergency when ripe run out of V4 (5M address 
now, aprox 5K new LIR).

Why not doing a prupose based on LIR, a first lir account receive a /22, 
if a same entity open a second account, they only receive a /24.
That prupose is to avoid some LIR with huge amount take all space and 
let's nothing for small LIR wo can't do.

Actualy a /22 from RIPE cost 4800€ VAT EXCL (2 year + setup) , on market 
it's 15- 20K€

I know some company can have multiple entity to buy extra range. Some 
company is cheap to register like in UK.
Maybe use company UBO registry obligation in EU can fight that ?

Best regards
Cedric

Le 06-02-19 à 00:19, Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg a écrit :
>
> I was unaware about this list limitation, but hope this helps... :-)
>
> Regards,
> Carlos
>
> =========
> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:18:45
> From: Michael Kafka <mika at net-cat.at>
> To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] New on this list, cannot reply to old topic
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to join the discussion here on the list but I just registered
> so I can't reply to the existing topic and I don't want to start a new
> thread.
>
> For the sake of a clean thread, can someone please reply to:
> [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4
> Allocations to a /24)
>
> Thanks, MiKa
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 12:04:26
> From: Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net>
> To: "address-policy-wg at ripe.net" <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4
>     Allocations to a /24)
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-02, "Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24"
> is now available for discussion.
>
> This proposal aims to reduce the IPv4 allocation size to a /24 once the
> RIPE NCC is unable to allocate contiguous /22 ranges.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-02
>
> As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this
> four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide
> feedback to the proposer.
>
> At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of
> the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal.
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 5 March 2019.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Officer
>
>