[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 17:30:14 CET 2019
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 12:04, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > > This proposal aims to reduce the IPv4 allocation size to a /24 once the > RIPE NCC is unable to allocate contiguous /22 ranges. > Is it worth having a period of handing out two or three (potentially non-contiguous) /24s when the last complete /22 disappears, before moving to just a single /24 (with a step at 2 if we start at 3)? I can see the logic between the change in sizes, I'm just wondering if there was a case for intermediatory steps to reduce the pain Either way, I support the proposal with or without this change Thx J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190204/1eae502c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]