[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
garry at nethinks.com
garry at nethinks.com
Mon Feb 4 15:20:09 CET 2019
> >> On 4 Feb 2019, at 13:58, Daniel Karrenberg <dfk at ripe.net> wrote: >> >> The question before us is: What is the minimum useful allocation? > Well yes Daniel. > > But how long does that discussion last? Perhaps 5-10 years from now we’ll be debating policies on how the NCC allocates /30s or /31s of v4. :-) No, because (hopefully) the prefix filters on the v4 Internet will never EVER allow anything smaller than a /24 to be routed on the open Internet ... Allowing LIRs to obtain their /22 - even if it is in up to 4 subnets - will be a lot better than not being able to supply _any_ v4 addresses to those late adopters due to only having the policies with /22 ... -garry -- Garry Glendown * Professional Services & Solutions NETHINKS GmbH | Bahnhofstraße 16 | 36037 Fulda T +49 661 25 000 0 | F +49 661 25 000 49 | garry.glendown at nethinks.com Geschäftsführer: Uwe Bergmann, Bastian Marmetschke Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Garry Glendown | AG Fulda HRB 2546 PGP Fingerprint: B1CF 4952 F6EB E060 8A10 B957 700E F97F B412 DD32 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190204/ebab01f0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]